Weblog

Monday, 15 June 2009

  • The great mistake of many theologians is the notion that Jesus came to restore man to his pre-fall state.  This misconception is great because it forgets that the righteousness imparted from Christ is much greater than the sinless existence of Adam.

Thursday, 11 June 2009

  • Filling what is lacking

    I am filling up what is lacking in Christ’s afflictions (Col 1:24).

    What could be lacking in Christ’s afflictions?  Oh, there is nothing lacking, Christ took upon Himself the stripes of His sheep (Isa 53).  The afflictions of those called unto Him (John 6:37), has He taken upon Himself (2Cor 5:21).

    What is Paul here claiming?  It is not that he is taking upon himself the affliction of the wicked, nor is he claiming to take part in the substitutionary death of Christ.  Paul is not claiming to be anything more than a representative of Christ.  It is much in the same manner that in Philippians Paul claims that Epaphroditus has completed what was lacking in the service of the Philippians to Paul (Phil 2:30).  In his risking of his own life Epaphroditus found Paul in order to deliver unto him what was sent from the church there in Philippi.  More along these lines does Paul claim “for me to live is Christ” and following it with telling that “to remain in the flesh is more necessary on your account.”

                    Paul is here linking himself in as a representative of Christ to the Colossians and to the Philippians.  His constant suffering for their respective sake is a representation of what a minister of the gospel is to do.  Paul consistently labors on for the gospel to take a shape that extends beyond Christ as one who simply saves from sin.  It has fuller implications; if Paul as a messenger of the gospel of Jesus Christ makes full what is lacking in Christ’s afflictions; there is something more to it.  That is, forgiveness of sins is not the end of it, sharing the gospel is not the only task of it.  Paul suffers for those who he loves; he suffers for those who Christ loves.

Sunday, 12 April 2009

  • The Nearness of God pt.1

    http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"> name="ProgId" content="Word.Document"> name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 12"> name="Originator" content="Microsoft Word 12">

    “I will turn aside to see this great sight, why the bush is not burned.”  Moses’ first encounter with the almighty was a captivating one; the appearance of God in a bush was the farthest thing from Moses’ mind at the time.  The bush which burned and was not consumed called out to Moses, it drew him near.  While many of us are aware of the transaction that takes place at this scene; Moses being sent out to free the people of God from the tyranny of the Egyptian Pharaoh we often move on with a simple knowledge of the revelation of the name of God to Moses, YHWH.

    This revelation, which approached from different points of view holds different understandings by many, the mere revelation of the name YHWH, which was not revealed to Jacob, nor to Manoah (jdg 13:18).  Moses’ motivation for such knowledge was of course different from the others, but such a revelation was a higher honor than had been received before.  The name of the divine YHWH, most often translated as ‘I AM’ may be just as easily translated ‘I Will Be.’ The name ehyeh ăšer ehyeh (transliterated from the Hebrew), has been taken by many to be an existence statement of God’s eternality and being.  Yet, the word ehyeh was present earlier when Moses questioned how he would go to the people, God responded “ehyeh,” “I will be with you.”

    YHWH in this statement of his personhood is not simply stating an audible name of what He may be addressed as, but is giving insight to Moses into who He is in His essence.  God is not telling Moses, ‘hello, my name’s YHWH’ he is saying “I am the God who was with your forefathers, and now I am the God who is with you.”  For YHWH to start this address with, I am the God of your forefathers, the God of Abraham, of Isaac and of Jacob doesn’t simply identify that He is the God of the Hebrews, it is stating more than that.  It is stating that the God who prospered those men, the God who kept them and prospered them, the God who guided the line of Abraham into Egypt in Joseph, that God is not distant, He isn’t sleeping and not paying attention.  He is the God who hears His people and seeks to deliver them.  Ex 3:7-8 explains that God has heard their cries and sees their affliction, He has promised to their forefathers that He would make them a mighty people who would inherit a beautiful land, and He has come to do that now, through Moses.

    The revelation to Moses is revealing more than the fact that God can be called upon as a personal name; He is a God who desires to be near His people.

Friday, 12 December 2008

  • Currently
    Rocks Won't Cry
    By Shane Barnard
    see related
    OUR belief of the Scriptures to be the word of God, or a divine revelation,
    and our understanding of the mind and will of God as revealed in them, are
    the two springs of all our interest in Christian religion. From them are all
    those streams of light and truth derived whereby our souls are watered,
    refreshed, and made fruitful unto God. It therefore concerneth us greatly to
    look well to those springs, that they be neither stopped nor defiled, and so
    rendered useless unto us. Though a man may have pleasant streams
    running by his habitation and watering his inheritance, yet if the springs of
    them be in the power of others, who can either divert their course or
    poison their waters, on their pleasure he must always depend for the
    benefit of them. - John Owen

    It is funny to me, at the end of the semester when I have spent most of my time reading and commenting on the scriptures which indeed did delight my mind, the thought of such scriptures not delighting my spirit.  It is true that such delights are to be found in the Word, but meditations upon such things are subverted for thoughts on them that I might comment on them for a grade.

    But, there they are, the Scriptures, the wellspring of life by which we come into the thought of God.  The revelation of the Word of God which is Christ Jesus.  We (I) must indeed brush aside the criticisms made of this and that passage, the textual critiques which are brought against historicity, and allow the Scriptures to carry the spiritual weight of more than what happened when it happened.  To allow the words of our Lord to be words which are beneficial for growth and remembrance.  They are the words of life as they have come from the giver of life and were intended for such a thing.

    The words of God were not intended to be analyzed, they were intended to bring truth, to be the truth to man, not to stand up to the thought of man.  There is no such truth which can be higher than God's truth, for if it is true it finds its nature to dwell in the nature of God for he was true before anything else was and truth flows from his truth.  This is truth, that the Lord God of Hosts gave His word that man might find delight in Him.

Wednesday, 29 October 2008

  • Heaven and holiness

    There is no imagination wherewith man is besotted, more foolish, none so pernicious, as this–that persons not purified, not sanctified, not made holy in their life, should afterwards be taken into that state of blessedness which consists in the enjoyment of God. Neither can such persons enjoy God, nor would God be a reward to them. . . .  Holiness is indeed perfected in Heaven: but the beginning of it is invariably confined to this world. – John Owen, The Holy Spirit.

    It was an interesting proposition when I read it the first time, posed by John Piper in God is the Gospel; which was the book that turned me onto John Owen.  John Owen surely poses the question in words we no longer understand, but the concept was the same.  When we consider heaven, we consider it with creature comforts.  We have come to think of heaven as an ideal domain for man, as an everlasting Disneyland where all of the vendors don’t charge a fee and admission is paid for by Jesus.  Well, not really but as Piper speaks of heaven and wanting to be there, it is a place where we want to go because there is no pain, everyone we love is there or we just don’t want to go to hell.  It is inoften that someone replies that they want to go to heaven because Jesus is there.

                    Piper’s version is most definitely a simpler version of Owen’s argument, it is simple because it does not grasp the meaning of Owen’s and leaves the reader feeling ashamed for not placing Christ at the center.  The reality as Owen places it before us is that there is nothing for the unsanctified soul to enjoy in the eternity of heaven.  The domain of heaven is the domain of God.  God dwells in utter holiness, he emanates holiness and he demands that those who serve Him would love holiness i.e. “Be holy for I am holy.”  God does not delight in the things that man delights in; God has no need for food, for entertainment, for dramas or any creature comforts.  God delights in holiness, if we would look to the commands set back in the Old Testament, the host of purity laws we find that they revolve around holiness, they are about purity.  God is sending a message to these people, that they should love holiness and conduct themselves thus in holy community.

                    The essential argument for conduct then is that the Christian is a person who in their life desires the things of God, not the things of man.  Indeed it should be a plain and evident fact of the life of the believer that they are being changed to represent the holiness of God, moreso that they would be a person who would delight in the holiness of God.  Their actions, thoughts and meditations would constantly move them heavenward into a higher and more disciplined view of holiness, the absolute transcendence and set-apartness of God.  These movements are not only present in the believer’s life, but are evident that they are from the One Creator God (John 3:21).

                    In this sanctified life, believers are then being prepared to love that eternal kingdom which exists beyond the veil of this world that we know, that abode of God which lasts forever.  This kingdom which images are told to us from prophets, that the glory of God is so grand that God’s eternal servants the seraphim cry out eternally “holy, holy, holy.”  This kingdom, which displays the glory of God eternally, we will no longer perceive it as through a glass (1 Cor 13:12), but that veil will be removed, His glory, eternally displayed. 

    If we don’t love such glory and such holiness now, how will we love it eternally?  If we feel as a caged bird in this life now, how will we feel come eternity? 

Top Tags

[no tags]

beeshmonkey8

  • Visit beeshmonkey8's Xanga Site
    • Name: Sean
    • Location: Orange County
    • Birthday: 10/17/1981
    • Gender: Male
    • Member Since: 1/24/2004

Archives

Don't worry - your calendar is here… to see it in action just click "Save" above and refresh the page.

About Me

[no info]